Geomatics Professor Interview Questions

The interviewer wants to see that you can carry a research project from idea to peer-reviewed publication, including your contribution when the work is collaborative. Use Situation, Task, Action, Result. Identify your role and your collaborators' roles. Tell it in order: the question and why it mattered, the data and methods, the main finding, and how it reached publication, including what changed after review. Keep the methods clear enough for committee members outside your specialty.

Sample answer: In my dissertation I asked why some neighborhoods in a mid-sized city lost tree cover faster than others. I classified aerial imagery from several decades, joined it to parcel and census data in GIS, and modeled the change. The strongest link was to lot subdivision, not household income, which surprised me. My first submission came back with a request for a stronger accuracy check on the image classification, so I added field verification at sample sites. The revised paper was accepted, and I now use the same approach in a follow-up project on suburban growth.

Pitfalls to avoid: listing every project instead of telling one story; burying the listener in technical detail; leaving out setbacks and how reviewer feedback improved the work.

The interviewer wants to know whether you pay attention to what students actually can do and adjust, rather than teaching the syllabus as written. Use Situation, Task, Action, Result: how you spotted the gap, what you changed, and how you checked that it helped.

Sample answer: In an upper-level urban geography course, the first lab showed that many students could not read a topographic map or interpret a map legend, even though the course assumed they could. Rather than slow the whole class, I added a short self-paced map reading module with practice questions and held two extra drop-in sessions. I also changed the next lab so students worked in pairs that mixed experience levels. Scores on the map interpretation part of the second lab rose noticeably, and fewer students came to office hours confused about basics. I now run a quick skills check in the first week of every course.

Pitfalls to avoid: blaming earlier courses or the students; describing a change without saying how you knew it worked; picking a gap you never actually closed.

The interviewer wants to know whether you can keep research moving while still teaching well and meeting service duties, a common struggle for faculty. Describe the system you actually use, then give a short example of a week when it was tested.

Sample answer: I plan each week on Sunday evening. Class prep and grading go on the calendar first, because students depend on fixed deadlines. Then I block two mornings for research and treat them like a class, and I keep committee work and email to afternoons. Within each area, I rank tasks by deadline and by who is waiting on me. During midterms last spring, a grant deadline landed the same week as a large set of exams. I moved one research morning to grading, told my co-author about the delay early, and asked the committee chair for an extra week on a report. Everything went in on time, and the research block was back the following week.

Pitfalls to avoid: saying you simply work longer hours; describing a perfect plan with no example; leaving research or service out of the picture.

The interviewer wants to see how your mentoring helped a geography student or teaching assistant develop a specific skill.

Use Situation, Task, Action, Result. Explain the person's starting point, the skill they needed, your coaching actions and the change you observed. Keep the focus on their learning rather than your own status or achievements.

For example: "A graduate student was comfortable collecting field data but struggled to explain the spatial analysis in a draft chapter. We met regularly, and I asked the student to walk me through each analytical choice instead of rewriting the section myself. When spatial autocorrelation caused confusion, we worked with a small practice dataset before returning to the thesis data. By our later meetings, the student could explain the issue and justify the chosen method without prompting."

Avoid taking credit for the student's work, listing general encouragement without specific coaching or claiming growth without describing something the person learned to do.

The interviewer wants to know whether you can make abstract ideas concrete for students who are new to the field. Use Situation, Task, Action, Result: the course and concept, why students struggled, what you changed, and how you knew it worked.

Sample answer: In an introductory physical geography course, students kept treating the world map on the wall as the true shape of the continents. Lecturing on projection math did not help. So I brought in oranges and had each group peel one and try to flatten the skin, then compared the sizes of Greenland and Africa on a Mercator map and an equal-area map. The discussion that followed was the best of the term. On the next quiz, most students could explain why every flat map distorts something, and several used the idea in their final map projects. I now open the unit with that exercise.

Pitfalls to avoid: describing the concept in detail but not what you did to teach it; claiming success without any sign that students learned; choosing a concept so simple that it shows little about your teaching.

The interviewer wants to see how you select information that answers a geography research question from the material available.

Use Situation, Task, Action, Result. State the question first, then identify the sources you gathered. Explain your criteria for including or excluding information, such as geographic scale, dates and variables. Source reliability matters, but keep relevance to the question central.

For example: "I was studying how access to neighborhood parks differed across a city. I gathered park locations, census tables and field notes on entrances. I selected population data at a scale that matched the neighborhoods and kept entrance locations because a park's center point would not show where people could enter. I left out recreation spending figures because they did not answer the access question. The selected information let me compare neighborhoods on the same basis."

Avoid including every available source, confusing trustworthy information with relevant information or leaving out how your choices helped answer the research question.

The interviewer wants to know whether you keep up with the field's tools and use them for a real purpose. Use Situation, Task, Action, Result: the problem, why you chose the tool, how you learned and introduced it, and what improved.

Sample answer: My environmental geography students were doing land cover projects by tracing features by hand from printed maps, which took weeks and taught little analysis. I learned to use free satellite imagery and an open-source GIS program over a summer, then rebuilt the project around it. I wrote a step-by-step guide, ran a hands-on lab in the first week, and kept office hours in the computer lab during the project. For the final assignment, students submitted maps with written explanations of the land cover patterns and the limits of their data. Their explanations connected changes in land cover to features they could identify in the imagery, rather than simply naming areas on a map. I kept that comparison in the next version of the assignment.

Pitfalls to avoid: describing the tool's features instead of what it changed; picking a tool you used once and dropped; skipping how you helped students or colleagues learn it.

The interviewer wants to learn how you handle a tense grade dispute while treating the student respectfully and applying grading criteria fairly.

Use Situation, Task, Action, Result to organize one real example from a geography course. Briefly explain the assignment and the student's concern. Focus on your own actions: listening, reviewing the work, and explaining your decision. Finish with the outcome and what you learned, including any change you made to prevent confusion.

For example: "A student was upset about the grade on a map assignment and said the criteria were unclear. I let them explain which comments they disputed, then reviewed those parts of the map with the rubric. I found that I had applied the criteria consistently, but one comment did not explain the deduction well. I clarified that comment and kept the grade. The student still disagreed, but we could discuss the work calmly. I learned to tie my written comments more clearly to the rubric."

Avoid blaming the student, changing a grade simply to stop the argument, or giving a general account that leaves out your own actions.

The interviewer wants to understand how you plan a course so the materials serve the learning goals and the students who enroll.

Name the main factors you weigh and show how they shape your choices. Common ones are the learning goals, students' starting level, accessibility, cost to students, how current the content is, and how you will assess learning. A short example helps.

Sample answer: "I start with what students should be able to do by the end of the course, then pick materials that build toward it. I think about who usually enrolls, so an introductory section gets more worked examples. I check that materials are accessible, such as captioned videos and readable files, and I try to keep costs down with library or open resources. Last year I replaced an expensive textbook with open readings and short weekly practice sets, and students said the practice helped them most."

Pitfalls: Don't list factors without an example. Avoid ignoring accessibility or cost. Don't describe reusing old materials without reviewing them.